*Same note as last time.
[This is the Rainforest video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGEHYY8c8VM&feature=related%20 ]
The idea of music being something strictly human is a pretty popular
notion and in general I find that many people do not consider recordings
not explicitly MADE by a human to be music. I would argue that the
Rainforest video is in fact music, even though it does not easily
pertain to the order we like. I believe that the theory of musique
concrete is very important as far as what is music: music isn't built
upon traditional instrumentation necessarily, and its direct corollary
is that music can be composed of sounds, not necessarily just
instruments. For example you can make a beat using a sample, and that's
not necessarily an instrument but it becomes more along the lines of an
instrument you manipulate.
Here's a direct example:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTfj57FP4f4
The
song mixes synthesizer with sounds of nature, as well as other
instruments of course. Whether the overall piece is music is a bit less
subjective, but I consider each component of the music to be music;
music is the confluence of sounds and each component is music. I
consider the ducks quacking to be music as much as the synthesizer or
the bass. This statement makes sense to me: you should not immediately
have music without the components not being music.
No comments:
Post a Comment